next up previous
Next: Continuous Transformation of Direction Up: Examples of Motor Field Previous: External Force Fields and

Population Coding of Direction

Georgopoulos (1995) surveys research on population coding in motor cortex of the direction of arm motion. The population codes are naturally treated as fields, and the transformations of directions are simple field computations. We consider a region in motor cortex in which activity is observed in anticipation of reaching motions. Each cell has a preferred direction in three-dimensional space. Cell activity falls off with the cosine of the angle between the reaching direction and the preferred direction . Since (for normalized vectors) the cosine is equal to the inner product of the vectors, , we can express the activity:

 

for some constants a and b.gif Thus the motor cortex represents a vector field of the preferred directions, and the population coding of an intended motion is a scalar activity field given by the inner product of the motion with the preferred-direction field.

There is another way of looking at the population coding of a motion , which is sometimes more illuminating. Since all the neurons have the same receptive field profile, we may rewrite Eq. 3 in terms of a radial function of the difference between the preferred and intended direction vectors: [ _u = (_u - r) , ] where [ (v) = a + b - b \| v \|^2/2 . ] This is because the Euclidean distance is related to the inner product in a simple way:

(provided ).

Now let be the direction field, defined over three-dimensional space, that corresponds to . That is, the value of at neural location u equals the value of at spatial location , or , which we may abbreviate . For simplicity we suppose is one-to-one, so we can define by . Notice that effects a change of coordinates from neural coordinates to three-dimensional space. The direction field can also be expressed as the result of convolving the receptive field with an idealized direction field , a Dirac delta, which has an infinite spike at but is zero elsewhere: [ = _r . ] This is because convolving with effectively translates the center of to ; equivalently, the convolution blurs the idealized direction field by the receptive field profile .


next up previous
Next: Continuous Transformation of Direction Up: Examples of Motor Field Previous: External Force Fields and

Bruce MacLennan
Wed Oct 2 16:55:07 EDT 1996